Opinion
Letter: National Farm Bureau ‘wrong-headed’ on cap and trade
Originally published in the January 22, 2010, print edition.
The Land — To the Editor:
The national Farm Bureau is wrong-headed regarding their stance on cap and trade. They are leading their membership to think that doing nothing about transitioning to a new energy economy is smart. It is not. Please consider four sober facts.
Fossil fuel is finite and our entire energy system is based on a vanishing resource. If we fail to plan for an energy system transition and live day to day, how can that be better than a policy plan to transition? We could just pass a fuel tax, or carbon tax, but only market forces focused through cap and trade can find the least-cost formula.
National security is threatened with over 70 percent of our energy resources being imported. More wars will be fought over energy unless we act to become energy secure.
Building an economy around home-grown energy provides real and sustainable economic growth, not like a service economy, derivatives and the dot-com bubble. Renewable energy systems encourage economic development in rural communities, helping to stem the on-going rural population decline.
Climate change cannot reasonably be denied. The bulk of the world’s scientists support the reality of climate change. Every gallon of gas burned in a car yields 19.3 pounds of carbon dioxide. Every gallon of this gas was sequestered below ground until we tapped it around a hundred years ago. How could that much weight and volume not affect our atmosphere?
Taking action to curb carbon emissions and accelerate our transition to a new energy economy will cost a lot of money, but it will cost much more money and pain to wait. Please, national Farm Bureau, think!
John W. Baumgartner
Olivia
- Opinion
-
-
Land Minds: Bumps on the road to liberty
I sense we are becoming a nation of entitlements. And in the process of this slide into socialism, I sense that we can no longer rely upon the “political process” to reverse this uncomfortable transition. “What’s in it for me?” seems to be the new mantra now embraced by many people including our elected officials.
-
Farm and Food File: USDA-DOJ seed competition workshop better work
Holding the “first joint Department of Justice/USDA workshops ever on competition and regulatory issues” in Iowa, the heart of corn and soybean country, just weeks before every seed-buying farmer in America will be pedal-to-the-metal planting this year’s crop is bigger than Daytona, bigger than the All Star game and bigger than the Super Bowl.
-
Land Minds: All the news that’s fit to print
To get a taste of what our friends in the big-time, mainstream media are up to, I try to keep an eye out for New York Times stories that deal with farming and agriculture.
-
Farm and Food File: Saul to Paul; Friedman to Keynes
In a nine-page story for The New Republic, Judge Markets Rock declared himself Judge Markets Reek and in one Michael Jordan-like move, Posner dumped Chicago and Friedman for England and John Maynard Keynes.
-
Farm and Food File: U.S. cows, cowboys and wheat acres disappearing
A quick peek at many of today’s operative numbers in American agriculture should raise rural eyebrows and maybe a few Capitol Hill curiosities. The latest cattle figures from the U.S. Department of Agriculture illustrate what I mean.
-
Commentary: A chill hits wind power’s production
The cost of the “free wind”? Projections are about 17 cents per kilowatt-hour — far higher than other energy sources. One of my neighbors has just invested $100,000 in a wind turbine. I think he’s wasted his money — and some of yours.
-
Land Minds: A winter for the ages
I must have had a premonition that we would have a winter like this, since I bought my first snow blower last fall (thanks for the deal, John).
-
Farm and Food File: Consumers aren’t stupid, so stop ‘educating’ them on what they need
Give customers a chance to pick between a pork chop “produced” by a pork “producer” or one raised with skill and husbandry by a hog “farmer,” and what chop will they take? Right; so give ’em what they want, not what you want.
-
Farm and Food File: Only a coincidence? You’ve got to be kidding me
$4 million in taxpayer money headed your way at 10:30 and by 12:30 you’re headed to a plush Mexican beach playground for a five-day ‘marketing conference’ in the middle of the Midwestern winter.
-
Letter: Health care questions for Walz
Would you explain just how the bill saves money on health care when you add 50 million to the number to be taken care of. Do you ration the use of tests or procedures, expensive drugs, etc.?
- More Opinion Headlines
-
