Opinion
Letter: National Farm Bureau ‘wrong-headed’ on cap and trade
Originally published in the January 22, 2010, print edition.
The Land — To the Editor:
The national Farm Bureau is wrong-headed regarding their stance on cap and trade. They are leading their membership to think that doing nothing about transitioning to a new energy economy is smart. It is not. Please consider four sober facts.
Fossil fuel is finite and our entire energy system is based on a vanishing resource. If we fail to plan for an energy system transition and live day to day, how can that be better than a policy plan to transition? We could just pass a fuel tax, or carbon tax, but only market forces focused through cap and trade can find the least-cost formula.
National security is threatened with over 70 percent of our energy resources being imported. More wars will be fought over energy unless we act to become energy secure.
Building an economy around home-grown energy provides real and sustainable economic growth, not like a service economy, derivatives and the dot-com bubble. Renewable energy systems encourage economic development in rural communities, helping to stem the on-going rural population decline.
Climate change cannot reasonably be denied. The bulk of the world’s scientists support the reality of climate change. Every gallon of gas burned in a car yields 19.3 pounds of carbon dioxide. Every gallon of this gas was sequestered below ground until we tapped it around a hundred years ago. How could that much weight and volume not affect our atmosphere?
Taking action to curb carbon emissions and accelerate our transition to a new energy economy will cost a lot of money, but it will cost much more money and pain to wait. Please, national Farm Bureau, think!
John W. Baumgartner
Olivia
- Opinion
-
-
Land Minds: Dennis helped others get better
The Land lost a family member Memorial Day weekend. Dennis John Kelly, writer of the "Grain Angles" column for 15 years, lost a short, but valiant battle with pancreatic cancer.
-
Farm and Food File: Trade talks stuck in past
The surest way to confirm if anyone in Washington, D.C. is telling you the truth about trade is to watch their lips: if they move, they're stretching the blanket one way or the other.
-
Farm and Food File: June was cultivator month; time for Uncle Honey show
I don't know where the term originated but I do know two things about laying-by corn. First, it never meant the weeds laid down; Dad always followed the last cultivator pass with a 2,4-D soaking a week or so later.
-
Letter: Coveting thy neighbor's stuff
Letter: Coveting thy neighbor's stuff
-
Commentary: HSUS - wolves in sheep's clothing
In 2008, Dan Mathews, vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said, "when you consider any movement for social change, it's really got to be seen as a generational one.
-
Commentary: Species safe even if world warms
Biologists are again predicting massive species losses as the world warms. But where are the corpses?
-
Land Minds: A lot to think about this spring
What a spring and kudos to you Minnesota farmers. I doubt if you ever have planted this much crop this early and this easily. There just weren't any serious challenges from Mother Nature.
-
Farm and Food File: Alabama fried chicken - antitrust chief taking your calls
In a morning session of the May 21 U.S. Department of Justice-Department of Agriculture workshop on ag and antitrust enforcement, Alabama poultry grower Garry Staples told officials he expected "retaliation" from the firm he grows chickens for because of his participation in that event's discussion of poultry contracts.
-
Farm and Food File: Suppose you support farm bill reform; it could be cheaper
Suppose the House ag committee asks you to come to Washington to offer your ideas on how to improve the farm bill for its 2012 update.
-
Letter: God is love - God loves Hispanics, too
Some think we should follow Arizona's horrible example. They call undocumented immigrants "criminals."
- More Opinion Headlines
-
