To the Editor:
It’s a familiar story: A bright, ambitious 22-year-old who grew up in a small Minnesota town decides to move to the Twin Cities after graduating from college because that’s where she can find a well-paying job.
Everyone living in rural Minnesota can insert the names of numerous individuals they know into the story described above. It’s no secret that much of the struggles today in our parts of the state — and throughout rural America in general — are directly tied to the fact that too many young people are moving away from our small towns and rural areas for “bigger and better opportunities” in the Twin Cities.
If you talk to young people who have moved away, most of them will tell you that they’d love to come back home to raise their own families where they grew up. Unfortunately, they say, the professional jobs back home are few and far between and they pay nowhere near what the jobs pay in the Twin Cities.
It pains me to admit that what our former neighbors are saying about well-paying job opportunities in rural and small-town Minnesota is true. All, however, is not lost.
While they are still outnumbered by stories of our college graduates moving to the Twin Cities, more and more stories of young professionals from rural Minnesota moving back home are popping up.
Today, people can work from anywhere if they have access to high-speed internet service. A woman I know works for a Twin Cities insurance company from her home between St. James and Sleepy Eye. A colleague of my friend works for a Twin Cities public relations agency remotely from his home in Perham, traveling to his office in Bloomington for meetings just once every other week.
High-speed internet service and telecommuting-friendly Twin Cities employers offer rural Minnesota professionals the best of both worlds: They can have jobs with Twin Cities employers making Twin Cities salaries while living and raising their families in rural Minnesota.
Of course, telecommuting is not an option without high-speed internet, and too much of rural Minnesota is without this service, or it’s too slow or too expensive.
The Minnesota Ultra High-Speed Broadband Task Force — a 23-member panel of representatives from government, various communities, businesses and telecommunications companies — recently issued a report calling for everyone in our state to have access to high-speed internet service, with download speeds of 10 to 25 megabits per second, by 2015.
This is an ambitious goal, and how we are going to realize it is not yet clear. What’s crystal clear, however, is that we must do everything we can to make doing business in rural Minnesota more viable for more people and more companies, and high-speed internet service can help make this happen.
Brad Finstad
Center for Rural Policy and Development Executive Director
St. Peter
Letters to the Editor
Letter: Fast internet key to rural vitality
Originally published in the Dec. 25, 2009, print edition.
- Letters to the Editor
-
-
Letter: Coveting thy neighbor's stuff
Letter: Coveting thy neighbor's stuff
-
Letter: God is love - God loves Hispanics, too
Some think we should follow Arizona's horrible example. They call undocumented immigrants "criminals."
-
Letter: Research doesn't show organic foods are better
As a conventional beef producer, I take great satisfaction in producing beef that is a great value, and also safe, wholesome and nutritious.
-
Letter: Don't put pollution blame on small livestock farms
When talking about water pollution problems caused by livestock operations, Minnesota State Representative Al Juhnke of Willmar wants to blame our state's smaller livestock operations.
-
Letter: Juhnke passing false blame to pass proposal
Family farmers and rural residents need to know that Rep. Al Juhnke of Willmar is proposing legislation that will weaken environmental standards for the largest farms in our state. As a livestock farmer and registered nurse, that concerns me and I think it is wrong.
-
Letter: Encourage the weak to give them a chance
"You cannot strengthen the weak by weakening the strong." However, we also must note that in order to encourage the weak you must give them a chance to have some opportunity to achieve a decent livelihood.
-
Letter: Scare tactics misrepresent ethanol’s impact
After watching the KSTP newscast on ethanol, I believe the newscasters seem to have torn a page from Orson Welles’ recipe on how to boost their audience numbers.
-
Letter: The rest of the organic, beef labeling story
Unlike the label “organic” — which requires you to be certified — the perception of what is “natural” has definitely been highjacked and is a totally misused and maligned at the meat counter.
-
Letter: ‘Socialism’ essential to farmers, American way of life
We farmers and our lobbyists have often made it quite clear to our legislators that socialism and its accompanying federal dollars are essential to our well-being.
-
Letter: Health care questions for Walz
Would you explain just how the bill saves money on health care when you add 50 million to the number to be taken care of. Do you ration the use of tests or procedures, expensive drugs, etc.?
- More Letters to the Editor Headlines
-
Letter: Coveting thy neighbor's stuff
