The surest way to confirm if anyone in Washington, D.C. is telling you the truth about trade is to watch their lips: if they move, they're stretching the blanket one way or the other.
Of course, not many lips have moved on trade last year or this year. Indeed, on the White House to-do list, trade talks appears somewhere between "Reorganize United Nations" and "Reorganize closet."
That might be a tad unfair. After all, President Obama did choose Ron Kirk as the nation's trade representative.
Ron. ah. who?
You know, Ron Kirk, former two-term mayor of Dallas, former lobbyist, former nothing-to-do-with-trade guy.
Given the staleness of the nearly decade-long global trade talks, maybe that's a good thing. Begun in Nov. 2001, the Doha Development Round was to negotiate lower trade barriers around the world so developing economies might get their growing feet in bigger, richer markets. Those feet, however, got crunched in 2008 when (after years of dodging of rocks, bottles and protests from anti-globalization forces) the European Union, Japan and the U.S. shut down talks in a standoff over their domestic ag subsidies and developing nations' non-tariff trade barriers. An American presidential election and a near-global economic meltdown kept the talks on ice for a year more.
Now the World Trade Organization wants to restart talks. So far, initial efforts have met widespread yawns. For its part, the U.S. remains slow to re-engage until fast developing nations, like China, India and Brazil, offer more market access in return for American farm subsidy cuts. It's déjà vu all over again.
Trade watchers like Tim Wise and Kevin Gallagher, both at Tufts University's Global Development and Environment Institute, suspect many of the old negotiating approaches employed by the WTO and its bigger members will keep Doha from yielding anything for any nation.
For instance, wrote the duo in late 2009, despite "a global financial crisis brought on by weak regulation of the financial markets.. the WTO prattles on about further deregulation of financial services." Any bets that will happen?
Also, most mainline U.S. ag groups continue to stand pat on their 2001 - or 2003, 2005 or 2008; the year matters little - approaches to both bilateral and multilateral trade talks: Open your markets or we'll huff and puff and blow your barn down.
On May 3, the usual ag free traders gathered just outside Washington to move their lips in unison, again, on the importance of "free trade agreements for agriculture and encourage President Obama and Congress to ratify FTAs (free trade agreements) with South Korea, Panama and Columbia."
Four weeks later, 16 tea leaf-reading U.S. senators repeated the call. The two key reasons cited by the senators were 1.) Europe is negotiating trade deals with "a number of Central American countries" and 2.) the FTAs would increase American gross domestic product - pegged at $14.3 trillion in 2009 - by $16.6 billion.
While $16.6 billion is a nice chunk of business, it also matches the trade deficit - $16.5 billion, according to the U.S. Census Bureau - compiled by the U.S. with China in the short month of Feb. 2010.
That's the problem with any talk about renewed trade negotiations; no one ever talks about net trade, all everyone ever talks about is increased trade. The two are not the same.
Look at it this way; while you can get a drink of water from fire hose chances are pretty good the sip will cost you a lip. Not smart, right?
So let's stop talking about free trade and start talking about smart trade; trade where we actually don't lose money, jobs or global leadership.
Until then, watch those lips. If they move, well, you know .
...
Alan Guebert's "Farm and Food File" is published weekly in more than 75 newspapers in North America. Contact him at agcomm@sbcglobal.net.
Farm & Food File
Related Photos
-
Alan Guebert Alan Guebert
Discussion
Farm and Food File: Trade talks stuck in past
Originally published in the June 18, 2010, print edition.
- Farm & Food File
-
-
Farm and Food File: Trade talks stuck in past
The surest way to confirm if anyone in Washington, D.C. is telling you the truth about trade is to watch their lips: if they move, they're stretching the blanket one way or the other.
-
Farm and Food File: June was cultivator month; time for Uncle Honey show
I don't know where the term originated but I do know two things about laying-by corn. First, it never meant the weeds laid down; Dad always followed the last cultivator pass with a 2,4-D soaking a week or so later.
-
Farm and Food File: Alabama fried chicken - antitrust chief taking your calls
In a morning session of the May 21 U.S. Department of Justice-Department of Agriculture workshop on ag and antitrust enforcement, Alabama poultry grower Garry Staples told officials he expected "retaliation" from the firm he grows chickens for because of his participation in that event's discussion of poultry contracts.
-
Farm and Food File: Suppose you support farm bill reform; it could be cheaper
Suppose the House ag committee asks you to come to Washington to offer your ideas on how to improve the farm bill for its 2012 update.
-
Farm and Food File: Ag highlighted in new cancer report
The Agriculture Health Study that now tracks 89,000 men, women and children in the "agricultural population," shows that "Farmers and pesticide applicators have significantly higher prostate cancer risk, and female spouses have a significantly higher incidence of melanoma."
-
Farm and Food File: Elbow-deep in atrazine review politics
Forty-five years may have dimmed a frame or two of memory but I can still see my father emptying small bags of flour-like powder into a five-gallon bucket and, then, slowing stirring in a trickle of water until the two ingredients combined to make a chalky, white cream. The bags contained the still-new, pre-emergent herbicide atrazine.
-
Farm and Food File: Facts, figures and fools with money
What diesel fuel is to tractors, facts are to journalists. Diesel is expensive; facts, for the most part, are free. Moreover, facts are all over.
-
Farm and Food File: Main Street banks want reform
Rare is the day when the U.S. Senate ag committee lands on the front page of the New York Times. That day, however, came April 20 when the Times, in its running coverage of financial reform in the Senate, highlighted the aggies' role in that effort: regulation of casino-like derivatives.
-
Farm and Food File: I'm not making this up; it was in the newspaper
Asked once for the source of his best material, American humorist Will Rogers quickly replied that "Everything I know I get from the newspaper."
-
Farm and Food File: No more beautiful spring capital than Washington, D.C.
With the possible exception of Paris, none other of the world's great capital cities is more beautiful in early spring than Washington, D.C.
- More Farm & Food File Headlines
-
