Suppose the House ag committee asks you to come to Washington to offer your ideas on how to improve the farm bill for its 2012 update.
Suppose you search your closet for your "new" - well, it's new to you - white shirt and you go.
Suppose you begin your testimony by stating the blindingly obvious: The next U.S. farm bill should do what it's designed to do in the most cost-effective way without hurting farmers, ranchers, the environment and our trading partners.
A solid, if dull, start, right?
Suppose you clear your throat and continue by noting that the federal "crop insurance program has cost taxpayers $37 billion since 2000." Also, of the $13 billion spent by taxpayers on crop insurance "in the last two years, more than $7 billion flowed to companies."
Suppose an eyelid or two on the committee dais twitches.
Suppose you take that sign of life as a cue to jump feet-first into the centerpiece of their 2008 handiwork, ACRE, the Average Crop Revenue Election devised for the farm bill, and SURE, or Supplemental Revenue Assistance Payments, another 2008 creation.
Suppose your voiced opinion of both ends with the phrase "no longer have a public justification."
Suppose you continue by allowing how "The public and members of Congress have shown widespread distaste for the bailouts of big banks, GM, Chrysler and AIG. But at least these interventions were justified in that the economy was threatened with a far more severe downturn if these companies were allowed to fail."
Suppose you look up now and see that members' eyes are narrowing.
Hmm, back off or reload? Forget the white shirt; reload.
"Farmers receive $5 billion a year" - in direct payments, but you suppose the aggies know this - "for nothing more than owning or renting farmland that happens to have base acres."
Suppose you quickly add, "Despite mighty efforts by some of the world's best agricultural economists to find some market impact of direct payments, the evidence suggests that they represent 'money for nothing.' Surely we can accomplish more with $5 billion than simply depositing it in the bank accounts of landowners and renters with base acres."
As the quote marks indicate, none of this - excepting the white shirt fiction - is supposition. The words, and written testimony, were offered to House aggies May 13, by Bruce Babcock, an ag economist and director of the Center for Agricultural and Rural Development at Iowa State University.
Babcock's analysis was hot, straight and hard. To ensure House members got his simple message, he offered it plainly.
Our current farm program, he said, "consists of crop insurance, which costs too much; direct payments, which are no longer justified; cotton payments, which need to be brought into (trade) compliance; ACRE, which duplicates crop insurance but provides inadequate coverage against farm yield losses; and SURE, which tries to make up for crop insurance deficiencies."
Babcock offered a simple fix for most of what ails the 2008 law: change ACRE from a state-level program to a "county-level program;" boost ACRE coverage from its capped 83.3 percent to 100 percent; and "do away with any program feature that requires farm-level yield reporting." (The brief testimony and supporting data are posted at http://agriculture.house.gov/testimony/111/h051310/Babcock.pdf).
Why would a key developer of crop insurance programs like Revenue Assurance question it while advocating ACRE and SURE reform? Simple, says Babcock in a telephone interview May 19. "The reforms continue what Congress began in 2008. They serve farmers better and they save an estimated $20 billion to $25 billion over the life of a new farm bill."
Suppose such a simple, billion-of-dollars fix stands a chance once agbiz and big ag get their hands around its neck?
Suppose it might if you, like Babcock, stood up for a less-costly, more effective farm bill?
...
Alan Guebert's "Farm and Food File" is published weekly in more than 75 newspapers in North America. Contact him at agcomm@sbcglobal.net.
Economy/Tech
Related Photos
-
Alan Guebert Alan Guebert
Discussion
Farm and Food File: Suppose you support farm bill reform; it could be cheaper
Originally published in the May 28, 2010, print edition.
- Economy/Tech
-
-
Farm Programs: Crop insurance considerations as varied as available options
The level of insurance coverage can result in some producers receiving crop insurance indemnity payments, while other producers receive no indemnity payments, even though both producers had the same guarantee and the same final yield.
-
Robotic milking lets cows produce on own schedule
Did you ever wonder how often a cow would like to be milked if she could set the schedule? Probably not. You likely have other questions to ponder. But the answer to this vexing question is 2.7 to 3.2 times within a 24-hour period.
-
Farm and Food File: Trade talks stuck in past
The surest way to confirm if anyone in Washington, D.C. is telling you the truth about trade is to watch their lips: if they move, they're stretching the blanket one way or the other.
-
Farm Programs: Biofuels industry hangs on words of Congress, EPA
Future development and expansion of the biofuels industry, particularly the ethanol industry, could be in trouble, if Congress and the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency continue to delay ethanol blends beyond the current maximum of 10 percent in the United States.
-
Scott Knutson - Farmer, inventor, small businessman
What farmer hasn't created something to make his work easier? Usually he keeps his labor-saving device a secret, but Scott Knutson, a wheat, soybean and sugar beet farmer from the Crookston area, markets his inventions.
-
Farm and Food File: Suppose you support farm bill reform; it could be cheaper
Suppose the House ag committee asks you to come to Washington to offer your ideas on how to improve the farm bill for its 2012 update.
-
Water, water everywhere -- Protecting agriculture's lifeline
With 10,000-plus lakes, the headwaters of the mighty Mississippi River, the large watershed of the Minnesota River and hundreds of lesser watersheds across the state, water is a daily ingredient in the life of Minnesota citizens. Zero in on Minnesota agriculture, and water is the life of the entire industry.
-
Electricity used to control dust in livestock barns
"The EPI system is an easy, low-cost and highly reliable process for quickly improving the environment of any confinement housing facility."
-
Commentary: So-called efficiencies creating 'ag disconnect'
"If we as eaters insist on food being a smaller and smaller percentage of our spendable income by continuing to separate ourselves from the source of that food, it will become a race to the bottom for agriculture, for rural communities, and for everyone's quality of life."
-
Farm Programs: Sign-up deadline for 2010 ACRE program June 1
Farm operators and land owners have until June 1 to sign-up for the ACRE program at county Farm Service Agency offices. Even if producers do not plan to enroll in the ACRE program, they need to enroll in the 2010 Direct and Counter-Cyclical Payment farm program by June 1 at their county FSA office, in order to receive their 2010 direct payments on eligible crops.
- More Economy/Tech Headlines
-
