On Oct. 20, the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment delivered a petition with more than 25,000 signatures from individuals around the country to U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack demanding that the agency immediately suspend the practice of providing guaranteed and direct loans for new and expanding specialized hog and poultry facilities. More than a month has passed and there has been no response from Vilsack about this pressing issue.
Hog farmers are hurting as low prices have persisted for many months — even years. Everyone is saying that there is a surplus of hogs and that herd sizes should be reduced. Despite the current overproduction situation and subsequent oversupply, the USDA’s Farm Service Agency continues to provide loans for new and expanding specialized hog and poultry facilities, which increase production and depress prices.
Based on USDA data, FSA direct and guaranteed loans for new hog and poultry building construction for FY 2008 and 2009 totaled $264,466,341. At the same time, the USDA is using taxpayer dollars for bonus pork and poultry buys, ostensibly in an attempt to stabilize prices resulting from the overproduction that the USDA is facilitating through direct and guaranteed loans.
On March 31, the USDA committed to a $25 million bonus pork buy; on Sept. 3, another $30 million; and on Nov. 10, the USDA committed to an additional $50 million pork buy. On Dec. 23, 2008, the USDA announced an emergency purchase of more than 60 million pounds of chicken products, at a cost of more than $42 million, in an attempt to create a market for surplus product.
When similar oversupply situations occurred in the past, the USDA suspended the use of loan programs for the construction of these specialized facilities to ensure that the agency did not continue to contribute to the detrimental impacts of severe overproduction. Specifically, on Jan. 8, 1999, the USDA issued a directive suspending all direct and guaranteed loan financing for the construction of specialized hog facilities, citing concerns that FSA loans could exacerbate the crisis of oversupply and low prices affecting the hog industry.
The January 1999 Federal Register stated “It is inconsistent with USDA policies for FSA to continue to finance construction of additional production facilities through direct loans and loan guarantees while other agencies within USDA expend resources to ameliorate over-supply conditions.”
This same action and leadership is needed from the USDA now. We are facing a time when credit needs are high in farm country and resources should be aimed at helping existing farmers weather these tough times. The last thing we need is federal farm loans that create more factory farms, more hogs and longer periods of low prices.
Apparently industrial livestock operations are considered “too big to fail” given that our tax dollars are being funneled through government-subsidized and protected loans that serve as tools for expansion. These loans benefit the integrators at the expense of farm families and their communities. Our analysis of past cycles supports our current concern that these loans will be used by lenders and big operators to expand and seize market share — driving more independent family farmers out of business.
For these reasons, we call for Vilsack to suspend immediately all direct or guaranteed farm ownership or operating loans for the construction or expansion of specialized hog or poultry production facilities. The continuation of public resources for this purpose at this time hurts farm families and rural communities, and is a wasteful and risky use of American taxpayers’ dollars.
•••
This commentary was submitted by Paul Sobocinski, Frank Jones and Ron Perry. Sobocinski is a member of the Land Stewardship Project and a hog farmer from Wabasso. Jones is a board member of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement and a farmer from Davis County, Iowa. Perry is a member of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center and a hog farmer from Livingston County, Mo.
In 2008, Dan Mathews, vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said, "when you consider any movement for social change, it's really got to be seen as a generational one.
"If we as eaters insist on food being a smaller and smaller percentage of our spendable income by continuing to separate ourselves from the source of that food, it will become a race to the bottom for agriculture, for rural communities, and for everyone's quality of life."
Agriculture is a dynamic industry full of growth and change, and yet unlike many other industries, it remains blessed with an abundance of small family-run businesses.
As Obama’s energy taxes force reductions in coal and oil production, the price of U.S. energy will double and triple — and so will the costs of the things we buy.
The cost of the “free wind”? Projections are about 17 cents per kilowatt-hour — far higher than other energy sources. One of my neighbors has just invested $100,000 in a wind turbine. I think he’s wasted his money — and some of yours.
The earthquake in Haiti was a devastating blow — but we don’t know how to prevent earthquakes. On the other hand, we do know how to prevent 500,000 kids from going blind every year, and even dying, due to severe Vitamin A deficiency. But we’re not preventing the blindness or the deaths.
It is increasingly important to remember that almost any human activity of any size or consequence will have both negative and positive externalities. Perhaps the reason for little acknowledgment of the positive externalities is that they are the raison d’être for the activity in the first place.
The USDA seems to expect serious climate-related farming problems ahead, but the recent changes in global climate have been tiny — and in the “wrong” direction.
Commentary
Related Links
Discussion
Commentary: Stop government loans to factory farms
Originally published in the December 11, 2009, print edition.
On Oct. 20, the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment delivered a petition with more than 25,000 signatures from individuals around the country to U.S. Department of Agriculture Secretary Tom Vilsack demanding that the agency immediately suspend the practice of providing guaranteed and direct loans for new and expanding specialized hog and poultry facilities. More than a month has passed and there has been no response from Vilsack about this pressing issue.
Hog farmers are hurting as low prices have persisted for many months — even years. Everyone is saying that there is a surplus of hogs and that herd sizes should be reduced. Despite the current overproduction situation and subsequent oversupply, the USDA’s Farm Service Agency continues to provide loans for new and expanding specialized hog and poultry facilities, which increase production and depress prices.
Based on USDA data, FSA direct and guaranteed loans for new hog and poultry building construction for FY 2008 and 2009 totaled $264,466,341. At the same time, the USDA is using taxpayer dollars for bonus pork and poultry buys, ostensibly in an attempt to stabilize prices resulting from the overproduction that the USDA is facilitating through direct and guaranteed loans.
On March 31, the USDA committed to a $25 million bonus pork buy; on Sept. 3, another $30 million; and on Nov. 10, the USDA committed to an additional $50 million pork buy. On Dec. 23, 2008, the USDA announced an emergency purchase of more than 60 million pounds of chicken products, at a cost of more than $42 million, in an attempt to create a market for surplus product.
When similar oversupply situations occurred in the past, the USDA suspended the use of loan programs for the construction of these specialized facilities to ensure that the agency did not continue to contribute to the detrimental impacts of severe overproduction. Specifically, on Jan. 8, 1999, the USDA issued a directive suspending all direct and guaranteed loan financing for the construction of specialized hog facilities, citing concerns that FSA loans could exacerbate the crisis of oversupply and low prices affecting the hog industry.
The January 1999 Federal Register stated “It is inconsistent with USDA policies for FSA to continue to finance construction of additional production facilities through direct loans and loan guarantees while other agencies within USDA expend resources to ameliorate over-supply conditions.”
This same action and leadership is needed from the USDA now. We are facing a time when credit needs are high in farm country and resources should be aimed at helping existing farmers weather these tough times. The last thing we need is federal farm loans that create more factory farms, more hogs and longer periods of low prices.
Apparently industrial livestock operations are considered “too big to fail” given that our tax dollars are being funneled through government-subsidized and protected loans that serve as tools for expansion. These loans benefit the integrators at the expense of farm families and their communities. Our analysis of past cycles supports our current concern that these loans will be used by lenders and big operators to expand and seize market share — driving more independent family farmers out of business.
For these reasons, we call for Vilsack to suspend immediately all direct or guaranteed farm ownership or operating loans for the construction or expansion of specialized hog or poultry production facilities. The continuation of public resources for this purpose at this time hurts farm families and rural communities, and is a wasteful and risky use of American taxpayers’ dollars.
This commentary was submitted by Paul Sobocinski, Frank Jones and Ron Perry. Sobocinski is a member of the Land Stewardship Project and a hog farmer from Wabasso. Jones is a board member of Iowa Citizens for Community Improvement and a farmer from Davis County, Iowa. Perry is a member of the Missouri Rural Crisis Center and a hog farmer from Livingston County, Mo.
In 2008, Dan Mathews, vice president of People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals said, "when you consider any movement for social change, it's really got to be seen as a generational one.
June 18, 2010
Biologists are again predicting massive species losses as the world warms. But where are the corpses?
June 18, 2010
"If we as eaters insist on food being a smaller and smaller percentage of our spendable income by continuing to separate ourselves from the source of that food, it will become a race to the bottom for agriculture, for rural communities, and for everyone's quality of life."
May 21, 2010
Agriculture is a dynamic industry full of growth and change, and yet unlike many other industries, it remains blessed with an abundance of small family-run businesses.
April 8, 2010
As Obama’s energy taxes force reductions in coal and oil production, the price of U.S. energy will double and triple — and so will the costs of the things we buy.
April 8, 2010
The cost of the “free wind”? Projections are about 17 cents per kilowatt-hour — far higher than other energy sources. One of my neighbors has just invested $100,000 in a wind turbine. I think he’s wasted his money — and some of yours.
February 26, 2010
The earthquake in Haiti was a devastating blow — but we don’t know how to prevent earthquakes. On the other hand, we do know how to prevent 500,000 kids from going blind every year, and even dying, due to severe Vitamin A deficiency. But we’re not preventing the blindness or the deaths.
February 12, 2010
Public deserves science-driven review of pesticide’s health, environmental impacts.
January 29, 2010
It is increasingly important to remember that almost any human activity of any size or consequence will have both negative and positive externalities. Perhaps the reason for little acknowledgment of the positive externalities is that they are the raison d’être for the activity in the first place.
January 29, 2010
The USDA seems to expect serious climate-related farming problems ahead, but the recent changes in global climate have been tiny — and in the “wrong” direction.
January 29, 2010
Powered by Local.com
Powered by Local.com
Site Map
© 2012 Community Newspaper Holdings, Inc. · CNHI Classified Advertising Network · CNHI News Service
Associated Press content © 2012. All rights reserved. AP content may not be published, broadcast, rewritten or redistributed.
Our site is powered by Zope. Some parts of our site may require you to download the Flash Player Plugin.
Privacy Policy | AP News Registry privacy policy
Terms and Conditions
Advertiser Index
The Land :: www.TheLandOnline.com 418 South Second Street, PO Box 3169 Mankato, MN 56001